The document, by Foreign Office press chief John Williams, was an unpublished draft of the dossier which was unveiled by Tony Blair on 24 September 2002.

The Foreign Office failed in its appeal against the Information Commissioner's order that it should release the draft.

It had said publishing it could inhibit the "effective conduct of government".

Weapons expert Dr David Kelly was found dead shortly after being named as the source of a BBC report suggesting the dossier was "sexed up" shortly before publication.

Balance of disclosure

Dr Kelly cited the example of the claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction which could be used within 45 minutes of him giving an order.

The report led to a high profile dispute between the BBC and Downing Street which culminated in Dr Kelly's death.

The task of investigating the "circumstances surrounding the death" of Dr Kelly was then handed to Lord Hutton who, following a two month inquiry, concluded the scientist had taken his own life.

Lord Hutton criticised the BBC and said the 45 minute claim had not been inserted into the dossier by Downing Street against the wishes of intelligence chiefs, stressing that the head of the Joint Intelligence Committee John Scarlett had had "ownership" of the dossier.

'Frank advice'

The Freedom of Information request for Mr Williams' draft to be made public was made by researcher Christopher Ames.

A passing reference was made to the Williams draft produced just over two weeks before the final dossier was published, during the Hutton inquiry, but it was never published.

The dossier released by the Foreign Office, which appears to be a re-draft of a document dated 24 July 2002, does not include the 45 minute claim.

The Foreign Office (FCO) refused to hand over the document, saying that its publication would "inhibit the free and frank provision of advice and the free and frank exchange of views for the purposes of deliberation".

Mr Ames complained to the Information Commissioner, who concluded that the balance "was in favour of disclosure".

He said there was "a strong public interest in disclosure in order better to inform the public as the process followed in preparing the dossier".

The FCO's appeal against that decision was rejected by the Information Tribunal, which said: "We do not accept that we should, in effect, treat the Hutton Report as the final word on the subject...

"Information has been placed before us, which was not before Lord Hutton, which may lead to questions as to whether the Williams' draft in fact played a greater part in influencing the drafting of the dossier than has previously been supposed."

The tribunal also revealed that the draft was "annotated in two different persons' handwriting, suggesting that at least one person other than the author had reviewed and commented on it".

However, the tribunal has ordered that one of the handwritten notes should be taken off the draft when it is released.

In a written statement to MPs, Mr Miliband said: "I have today released what has been described as John Williams' draft of the September 2002 Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction dossier.

"The document produced by John Williams, then head of the FCO's press office, was not commissioned as part of the formal drafting process and was not used as the basis for the dossier the government subsequently published, which was produced by the JIC."

(BBC)

<< Back